OK, I've had time to mull over it and it's not as big a deal as I first thought. I agree on some points about the analyses (which I knew was a bit of a problem before hand that I just hadn't gotten around to fixing yet) but the criticisms on my theory & literature I can't really see his grounds. Will not totally ignore them, but not many changes. Same with the field site justifications. Just need a couple more explanations and they should be done. The only puzzling comment is the 'substandard expression'. Still no idea where is Scott pointing that at...

*************************************************************************************************

Damn it! Still need to get memory cards for . How much more do I have to shell out for accessories??